- #Camtasia watermark for free
- #Camtasia watermark install
- #Camtasia watermark pro
- #Camtasia watermark software
What exactly is someone going to do with Camtasia in 30 days that they can't do with a free video editor? There's a lot of them available. I'm pretty sure that equates to a sale of Camtasia to that customer. Because that's exactly what I would want to happen. Or gain some benefits through the free trial is kind of ridiculous to me. If a customer used Camtasia for 30 days to make a lot of money. That would be a different story.īut if I were TechSmith? The notion that it would be bad thing.
#Camtasia watermark software
I'm not a large scale software distributor. "So to speak" Our relationship is a partnership actually. My customers are business owners looking to increase sales in most cases. More often than not I've given new customers their first video upfront.
Because given the chance, a great number of folks will do exactly that. The sad fact is, we have to implement measures to keep others from cheating us. And I see this as being no different at all. Do you just make the video and hand it over and hope they pay you? Or do you collect up front? If you don't collect up front, I might imagine you have some instrument in place to prevent using what you worked hard for until you collect payment.
I might assume that you make videos for others. Instead, it would just happen at the very end after rendering were complete and GOTCHA! Unexpected watermark time! My thoughts are that if they were, that screen wouldn't be seen. But the screen capture you shared earlier clearly shows that they aren't really trying to hide it. Sure, it's not advertised on the Camtasia pages. So I'd really love to know how anyone is hindered in the slightest by having the watermark present.
#Camtasia watermark for free
TechSmith's watermarking scheme actually worked and thwarted their efforts to just use the software and create the video for free and off they go. No?įor me, when I see folks lodging a complaint, just as we are seeing in this thread, I view it as nothing more than a sour grapes rant because the same folks complaining were never truly planning on actually purchasing the software anyway. Because it's TechSmith's business decision. And what you or I or anyone else says won't matter a bit. The thing is, at the end of the day, neither one of us truly knows why they make the decisions they do. We could speculate all week long about exactly why TechSmith chooses to do this or that.
#Camtasia watermark pro
The pro version has more features than most people would ever use. There would be nothing to work with.Ĭorel is loaded with features. Camtasia has very few features in the first place. They would have no way of stopping you or knowing that you did.Īs far as features goes.
#Camtasia watermark install
You could buy the pro version of Corel and install the Ultimate features for free. Once you have possession of them, you have them. They can't let you use them, because there a separate download that requires no activation.They are created by other manufactures. I think that's poor sales practices, but that's me.
That's what upsets people and can make them Non-customers.Complainers in this forum. Hoping when discovered, the customer will love the program and it will no longer matter? Theres only one logical explanation for that.They know people are discouraged by the restriction.So they keep the fact buried. That's less than up front about that watermark. Yet, it's not clear until you go to render your first video. People complain about the watermark in this forum quite often. So why aren't they loud and proud about the fact there's a watermark?
0 kommentar(er)
